header-logo header-logo

Legal firsts for women in the profession

27 March 2019
Issue: 7834 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Lady Hale, president of the Supreme Court, has paid tribute to the profession’s pioneers in a speech at King’s College, London last week.

She began with the women who tried to join the profession before the Sex Disqualification (Removal) Act 1919 but were refused. Margaret Howie Strang Hall petitioned Scotland’s Court of Session in 1900 for permission to take the qualifying exams but was rejected on the basis ‘persons’ in the relevant legislation could only mean ‘male persons’.

In England in 1903, Bertha Cave wrote to the Benchers of Gray’s Inn asking to be admitted as a student with a view to being called to the Bar. Her application was rejected by a special committee as caselaw showed women were not ‘persons’. Further appeal to the House of Lords did not succeed.

Issue: 7834 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll