header-logo header-logo

Legal life changers spread their wings

26 July 2018 / Fiona Bawdon
Issue: 7803 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7803_bawdon

The first two cohorts of Justice First Fellows have now qualified. Fiona Bawdon looks at how are they faring

The Legal Education Foundation (TLEF) launched its Justice First Fellowship scheme in 2014, when the LASPO (Legal Aid, Sentencing & Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) cuts and reductions in local authority grants had started to bite, prompting a virtual collapse in the availability of training contracts in the social welfare law sector. Against this backdrop, the scheme was seen as offering a ray of hope for the sector.

TLEF developed the blueprint for the fellowship after drawing inspiration from similar programmes in America. As well as meeting the cost of each trainee’s salary, TLEF grants (averaging around £80,000) also cover all the associated supervision and management costs.

An inevitable question from the outset was what would happen to the fellows after qualification? Would they still have jobs? Or would hard-pressed social welfare law providers be unable to afford to keep them on, once TLEF’s funding for the posts had come to an end?

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll