header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
26 July 2018 / Fiona Bawdon
Issue: 7803 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal life changers spread their wings

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7803_bawdon

The first two cohorts of Justice First Fellows have now qualified. Fiona Bawdon looks at how are they faring

The Legal Education Foundation (TLEF) launched its Justice First Fellowship scheme in 2014, when the LASPO (Legal Aid, Sentencing & Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) cuts and reductions in local authority grants had started to bite, prompting a virtual collapse in the availability of training contracts in the social welfare law sector. Against this backdrop, the scheme was seen as offering a ray of hope for the sector.

TLEF developed the blueprint for the fellowship after drawing inspiration from similar programmes in America. As well as meeting the cost of each trainee’s salary, TLEF grants (averaging around £80,000) also cover all the associated supervision and management costs.

An inevitable question from the outset was what would happen to the fellows after qualification? Would they still have jobs? Or would hard-pressed social welfare law providers be unable to afford to keep them on, once TLEF’s funding for the posts had come to an end?

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll