header-logo header-logo

26 July 2018 / Fiona Bawdon
Issue: 7803 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal life changers spread their wings

nlj_7803_bawdon

The first two cohorts of Justice First Fellows have now qualified. Fiona Bawdon looks at how are they faring

The Legal Education Foundation (TLEF) launched its Justice First Fellowship scheme in 2014, when the LASPO (Legal Aid, Sentencing & Punishment of Offenders Act 2012) cuts and reductions in local authority grants had started to bite, prompting a virtual collapse in the availability of training contracts in the social welfare law sector. Against this backdrop, the scheme was seen as offering a ray of hope for the sector.

TLEF developed the blueprint for the fellowship after drawing inspiration from similar programmes in America. As well as meeting the cost of each trainee’s salary, TLEF grants (averaging around £80,000) also cover all the associated supervision and management costs.

An inevitable question from the outset was what would happen to the fellows after qualification? Would they still have jobs? Or would hard-pressed social welfare law providers be unable to afford to keep them on, once TLEF’s funding for the posts had come to an end?

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll