header-logo header-logo

Legal privilege

24 November 2011
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

JSC BTA Bank v Shalabayev and another [2011] EWHC 2915 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 94 (Nov)

It was well established that if a communication or document qualified for legal professional privilege, that privilege was absolute. It could not be overridden by a supposedly greater public interest. It could be waived by the person entitled to it, and it could be overridden by statute but otherwise it was absolute.

There was no balancing exercise that had to be carried out. Although the possibility existed that, without waiving the privilege, a person could nonetheless indirectly forfeit the right to claim privilege, such as, for example, if the person had been given every chance to claim privilege within a reasonable period, and had failed to do so, the court should be very wary of allowing a potentially valid claim to privilege, however late it was made, to be indirectly overridden by the exercise of a case management power. Otherwise, there was a danger of a litigant’s substantive right to legal privilege being forced to yield, indirectly, to just the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll