header-logo header-logo

24 November 2011
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Legal privilege

JSC BTA Bank v Shalabayev and another [2011] EWHC 2915 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 94 (Nov)

It was well established that if a communication or document qualified for legal professional privilege, that privilege was absolute. It could not be overridden by a supposedly greater public interest. It could be waived by the person entitled to it, and it could be overridden by statute but otherwise it was absolute.

There was no balancing exercise that had to be carried out. Although the possibility existed that, without waiving the privilege, a person could nonetheless indirectly forfeit the right to claim privilege, such as, for example, if the person had been given every chance to claim privilege within a reasonable period, and had failed to do so, the court should be very wary of allowing a potentially valid claim to privilege, however late it was made, to be indirectly overridden by the exercise of a case management power. Otherwise, there was a danger of a litigant’s substantive right to legal privilege being forced to yield, indirectly, to just the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll