header-logo header-logo

07 April 2016
Issue: 7693 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Legal profession brainstorms Brexit

Law Society’s research suggests long term pain may follow short term gains

Lawyers could enjoy a short-term “Brexit bonanza” but would be disproportionately affected in the long-term, the Law Society’s chief executive has warned.

Law firms have been busy compiling advice in the run-up to the 23 June referendum. Herbert Smith, for example, has compiled a detailed briefing on the topic and Allen & Overy’s Global Law Intelligence Unit has published a paper providing a lawyer’s view on a broad range of associated legal issues.

Writing in NLJ this week, Catherine Dixon, chief executive of the Law Society, which does not hold a position on Brexit, says: “In the short term some solicitors could enjoy their widely trailed ‘Brexit bonanza’ as agreements are unpicked, contracts altered, new domestic rules written and the legal complexities of any changed relationship with the EU unravelled.

“However, based on an independent assessment we commissioned by Oxford Economics [The UK legal services sector and the EU], in the longer term a UK withdrawal is likely to disadvantage the legal services sector disproportionately when compared to other comparative areas of economic activity. This is due to the work we do for other sectors which are likely to be adversely affected themselves by Brexit.”

Lawyers—In for Britain, a group of British lawyers, published a detailed report last month setting out the case for EU membership. John Davies, Chairman, says: “Our conclusion is that the UK is stronger, safer and better off in the EU.”

However, this report was criticised by Lawyers for Britain, a group chaired by Martin Howe QC, which is campaigning for Britain to leave the current treaties and build a new relationship with the EU which preserves our trading links. They argue that the prime minister’s renegotiation changes little and reveals the UK’s lack of influence and the inability of the EU to reform. They argue that the EU reforms poor laws too slowly or not at all and that there are many pitfalls to EU regulatory harmonisation.

Deloitte’s latest quarterly survey of chief financial officers found that a potential Brexit is the top concern for Britain’s biggest businesses at the moment, yet 53% have “no plans” in place.

Issue: 7693 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll