header-logo header-logo

Legal professionals & employers open-minded towards AI despite low usage

Despite more than half of legal employers believing it is time to embrace artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace, almost 80% of law firms are not currently using AI tools, according to a recent survey.

Research conducted by recruitment company Hays found that only 13% of legal professional have used an AI tool, such as ChatGPT, in their current role. While almost a quarter of respondents feel that AI will have a positive impact on their work, more than half say that their employer is not preparing them adequately to use AI. Only 5% of employers thought AI should be feared, compared to 15% of legal professionals.

The key reasons cited by law firms as to why they are not using AI tools are that they are not currently needed, as well as gaps in knowledge and a lack of understanding of the benefits. However, 64% of employers stated their intention to allow monitored use by staff in the future; conversely, 21% anticipated that they will ban AI tools at work.

Yvonne Smyth, director at Hays specialising in the legal sector, commented: ‘It’s clear from our research that employers and professionals across a range of sectors, including legal, are open to embracing AI in the workplace. That being said, the uptake and usage by legal employers and professionals remains low across the sector, while legal employers work out how AI might benefit their organisations as well as evaluate the challenges that greater use of AI might create.

‘At present, greater use of AI is likely to deliver cost savings and improved productivity within the legal sector. However, legal employers aren’t currently investing in training to support upskilling at the rate required to keep up with the pace of change as technology progresses. Training will be crucial for both employers to equip their staff to optimise their careers and, in so doing, ensure their organisation fares well in a fast-changing digital age.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll