header-logo header-logo

Legal professionals & employers open-minded towards AI despite low usage

Despite more than half of legal employers believing it is time to embrace artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace, almost 80% of law firms are not currently using AI tools, according to a recent survey.

Research conducted by recruitment company Hays found that only 13% of legal professional have used an AI tool, such as ChatGPT, in their current role. While almost a quarter of respondents feel that AI will have a positive impact on their work, more than half say that their employer is not preparing them adequately to use AI. Only 5% of employers thought AI should be feared, compared to 15% of legal professionals.

The key reasons cited by law firms as to why they are not using AI tools are that they are not currently needed, as well as gaps in knowledge and a lack of understanding of the benefits. However, 64% of employers stated their intention to allow monitored use by staff in the future; conversely, 21% anticipated that they will ban AI tools at work.

Yvonne Smyth, director at Hays specialising in the legal sector, commented: ‘It’s clear from our research that employers and professionals across a range of sectors, including legal, are open to embracing AI in the workplace. That being said, the uptake and usage by legal employers and professionals remains low across the sector, while legal employers work out how AI might benefit their organisations as well as evaluate the challenges that greater use of AI might create.

‘At present, greater use of AI is likely to deliver cost savings and improved productivity within the legal sector. However, legal employers aren’t currently investing in training to support upskilling at the rate required to keep up with the pace of change as technology progresses. Training will be crucial for both employers to equip their staff to optimise their careers and, in so doing, ensure their organisation fares well in a fast-changing digital age.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—Ed Williams

DWF—Ed Williams

Public sector disputes capability bolstered by partner hire in Leeds

Blake Morgan—Scott Hilton, Joan Yu & Melia Hirst

Blake Morgan—Scott Hilton, Joan Yu & Melia Hirst

Firm strengthens corporate, real estate and insolvency teams with partner trio

Seddons GSC—David Seal & Emma Clifford

Seddons GSC—David Seal & Emma Clifford

Consultant and solicitor join commercial real estate team

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll