header-logo header-logo

Legal professionals & employers open-minded towards AI despite low usage

Despite more than half of legal employers believing it is time to embrace artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace, almost 80% of law firms are not currently using AI tools, according to a recent survey.

Research conducted by recruitment company Hays found that only 13% of legal professional have used an AI tool, such as ChatGPT, in their current role. While almost a quarter of respondents feel that AI will have a positive impact on their work, more than half say that their employer is not preparing them adequately to use AI. Only 5% of employers thought AI should be feared, compared to 15% of legal professionals.

The key reasons cited by law firms as to why they are not using AI tools are that they are not currently needed, as well as gaps in knowledge and a lack of understanding of the benefits. However, 64% of employers stated their intention to allow monitored use by staff in the future; conversely, 21% anticipated that they will ban AI tools at work.

Yvonne Smyth, director at Hays specialising in the legal sector, commented: ‘It’s clear from our research that employers and professionals across a range of sectors, including legal, are open to embracing AI in the workplace. That being said, the uptake and usage by legal employers and professionals remains low across the sector, while legal employers work out how AI might benefit their organisations as well as evaluate the challenges that greater use of AI might create.

‘At present, greater use of AI is likely to deliver cost savings and improved productivity within the legal sector. However, legal employers aren’t currently investing in training to support upskilling at the rate required to keep up with the pace of change as technology progresses. Training will be crucial for both employers to equip their staff to optimise their careers and, in so doing, ensure their organisation fares well in a fast-changing digital age.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Jersey litigation lead appointed to global STEP Council

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

Firm invests in future talent with new training cohort

NEWS
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
back-to-top-scroll