header-logo header-logo

Legal professionals & employers open-minded towards AI despite low usage

Despite more than half of legal employers believing it is time to embrace artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace, almost 80% of law firms are not currently using AI tools, according to a recent survey.

Research conducted by recruitment company Hays found that only 13% of legal professional have used an AI tool, such as ChatGPT, in their current role. While almost a quarter of respondents feel that AI will have a positive impact on their work, more than half say that their employer is not preparing them adequately to use AI. Only 5% of employers thought AI should be feared, compared to 15% of legal professionals.

The key reasons cited by law firms as to why they are not using AI tools are that they are not currently needed, as well as gaps in knowledge and a lack of understanding of the benefits. However, 64% of employers stated their intention to allow monitored use by staff in the future; conversely, 21% anticipated that they will ban AI tools at work.

Yvonne Smyth, director at Hays specialising in the legal sector, commented: ‘It’s clear from our research that employers and professionals across a range of sectors, including legal, are open to embracing AI in the workplace. That being said, the uptake and usage by legal employers and professionals remains low across the sector, while legal employers work out how AI might benefit their organisations as well as evaluate the challenges that greater use of AI might create.

‘At present, greater use of AI is likely to deliver cost savings and improved productivity within the legal sector. However, legal employers aren’t currently investing in training to support upskilling at the rate required to keep up with the pace of change as technology progresses. Training will be crucial for both employers to equip their staff to optimise their careers and, in so doing, ensure their organisation fares well in a fast-changing digital age.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll