header-logo header-logo

Legal shoppers highlight failings

11 August 2017
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Mystery shoppers who visited 50 small and medium-sized law firms uncovered multiple failings in enquiry handling

Potential clients were ignored as enquiries went unanswered—not one single enquirer who walked in to an office received a follow-up call after the initial discussion. A mere 10% of phone, and 12% of website, enquiries received follow-up communications, in the Shopper Anonymous survey, between February and May 2017.

The mystery shoppers made enquiries about common issues such as property purchase, wills and commercial business.

Only an average 58% of shoppers said they would contact the firm again after their enquiry.

Jonathan Winchester, Shopper Anonymous CEO says: ‘The figures show many participants are failing to convert new business opportunities. In many cases, enquirers were not responded to or were left feeling not properly catered for.’

 

 

Issue: 7758 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll