header-logo header-logo

Legal typeface: the letter of the law

17 June 2016 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7703_aamondt

Typeface in legal documents should not be underestimated, says Athelstane Aamodt

How much thought do you put into the typeface that you use to draft documents? Or the typeface that features on your writing-paper or business cards? Or the layout of your written work generally? If the answer is “none whatsoever”, then you might want to reconsider.

Typography matters a very great deal, and it should matter especially to lawyers. After all, we spend a great deal of our professional lives writing, whether it is a short e-mail or a skeleton argument for a hearing in the Court of Appeal. Our writing is important. And that makes typography important; the clear, elegant, easy-on-the eye written expression of an argument is going to be better appreciated and more easily digested.

Comic capers

Let me give an example: I once received a draft settlement agreement drafted by an opposing lawyer that was set in Comic Sans. In case you don’t know what Comic Sans is, fire up Microsoft Word and have a look at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll