header-logo header-logo

Legal typeface: the letter of the law

17 June 2016 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7703_aamondt

Typeface in legal documents should not be underestimated, says Athelstane Aamodt

How much thought do you put into the typeface that you use to draft documents? Or the typeface that features on your writing-paper or business cards? Or the layout of your written work generally? If the answer is “none whatsoever”, then you might want to reconsider.

Typography matters a very great deal, and it should matter especially to lawyers. After all, we spend a great deal of our professional lives writing, whether it is a short e-mail or a skeleton argument for a hearing in the Court of Appeal. Our writing is important. And that makes typography important; the clear, elegant, easy-on-the eye written expression of an argument is going to be better appreciated and more easily digested.

Comic capers

Let me give an example: I once received a draft settlement agreement drafted by an opposing lawyer that was set in Comic Sans. In case you don’t know what Comic Sans is, fire up Microsoft Word and have a look at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll