header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
18 June 2020 / Stephanie Vaughan
Issue: 7891 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

LegalOps: smart business for law firms

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
22941
Legal operations services to corporate legal departments: Stephanie Vaughan outlines a prime opportunity for law firms
  • The LegalOps function is broad and has grown in scope over the past decade, helping to enhance efficiency within legal departments.
  • LegalOps is no longer just about bodies, but about making those bodies quicker and more efficient.

Historically, legal operations (LegalOps) hasn’t been the strong suit or main focus of the in-house legal teams within corporate legal departments (CLDs). However, a variety of factors— from an evolving risk landscape to the emergence of new forms of technology like AI—are conspiring to push it to the forefront.

To be sure, there have always been the ‘Super Corporates’ that were big enough to tackle LegalOps in-house but, by and large, most CLDs don’t have bodies dedicated to this function.

For law firms this is an opportunity to offer LegalOps-related services to CLDs and, in doing so, further strengthen their standing with clients as strategic partners and trusted advisors.

The right information in the right

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
NLJ this week: Family law urged to ditch adversarial instincts
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll