header-logo header-logo

04 October 2012
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lemma in liquidation

Law firms exposed as liquidators appointed at large insurer

A large Gibraltar-based insurer which provides professional indemnity to solicitors is going into liquidation, leaving hundreds of law firms potentially exposed.

Lemma Europe Insurance Company is understood to have frozen claims payments, on the order of the Gibraltar regulator, the Financial Services Commission. A spokesperson at Lemma said Freddie White, managing director of Grant Thornton Gibraltar, has been appointed as provisional liquidator by the Gibraltar Supreme Court.

A Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) spokesperson said only one law firm was insured with Lemma and had been given SRA advice about finding a new insurer. He said he understood any claims would be covered, but was unable to confirm by whom.

However, Frank Maher, partner at Legal Risk, who advises law firms on risk management, said: “That was one firm for the current year.

“But the problem is those firms who were insured with it in 2010—it’s a few hundred firms. If £6.24m premiums were paid in 2010, and if each firm paid £40,000, then that would be 156. If each firm paid £20,000, then it’s 312.

“If Lemma is insolvent, then there will be problems with claims that are not settled, any that arise, and any that date back. It’s very serious.

“The SRA are being extraordinarily complacent to say it is just one firm.

“The Financial Services Compensation Scheme is there for these situations, but it only pays 90%, and you have to be an individual or a small firm, so one or two of these law firms may be outwith the limit. Also, the scheme will fix a quantification date for the compensation, and firms might be far from closing the claim when that applies.

“It’s quite unpleasant. There will be people putting their hands into their own pockets over this.”

The Insurance Times has reported that Lemma had written £6.24m worth of solicitors’ professional indemnity premiums.

According to a report in the Gibraltar Chronicle, the company’s problems date back to 2010 when “substantial claims” worth several million pounds were made against some solicitors’ professional indemnity policies.

The provisional liquidator is required to report to the Gibraltar Supreme Court on or before 28 February 2013.

Issue: 7532 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll