header-logo header-logo

Lessons to be learnt

02 June 2017 / David Hewitt
Issue: 7748 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7748_backpage

Modern lawyers & judges can take lessons from the 1917 case of Joseph Blackburn, says David Hewitt

I have written about Joseph Blackburn before. He is the man who was forced to fight in the Great War, even though he had already volunteered to do so (see ‘Joseph, 1917: a lesson for us all’, NLJ , 20 January 2017, p 22 & ‘Joseph: a lesson for us all (Pt 2)’, NLJ , 27 January 2017, p 22).

Joseph came from Thornton, near Blackpool, and when he made his case to a committee of local councillors, he was given an exemption from military service. But that exemption was taken away by the Central Tribunal, which sat in far-off Westminster and was led by the fourth Marquess of Salisbury.

I have looked at the tribunal’s surviving records and I believe that it acted wrongfully, not just by present-day standards, but also by rules it had made for itself.

Modern lessons

Although Lord Salisbury and his colleagues eventually acknowledged their error, nothing was

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll