header-logo header-logo

Lessons from Gard: time for assessors?

15 September 2017 / David Burrows
Issue: 7761 / Categories: Opinion , Family
printer mail-detail

Are the courts the best place to resolve complex inquiries? David Burrows asks if there is a role for independent assessors

Are the courts the best place to resolve complex inquiries? The case of Charlie Gard (Re Gard (A Child) [2017] EWHC 1909 (Fam), [2017] All ER (D) 148 (Jul) (Francis J)—the child who had severe brain damage and could not see or hear or breathe unaided because of a mitochondrial condition—calls for pause for procedural thought. It gives rise to questions of how can cases of complex inquiry best be handled by family courts in a way which parties feel is as fair as possible. Is a judge always the appropriate person to resolve these types of question; or are there others who could help? (Nothing here is intended to take away from Francis J all deep respect for the dignity and care with which he decided the case.)

Where specialist information (‘expert evidence’: (say) medical, engineering, scientific) is needed by the court, parties ask for permission to adduce such evidence as
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll