header-logo header-logo

15 September 2017 / David Burrows
Issue: 7761 / Categories: Opinion , Family
printer mail-detail

Lessons from Gard: time for assessors?

Are the courts the best place to resolve complex inquiries? David Burrows asks if there is a role for independent assessors

Are the courts the best place to resolve complex inquiries? The case of Charlie Gard (Re Gard (A Child) [2017] EWHC 1909 (Fam), [2017] All ER (D) 148 (Jul) (Francis J)—the child who had severe brain damage and could not see or hear or breathe unaided because of a mitochondrial condition—calls for pause for procedural thought. It gives rise to questions of how can cases of complex inquiry best be handled by family courts in a way which parties feel is as fair as possible. Is a judge always the appropriate person to resolve these types of question; or are there others who could help? (Nothing here is intended to take away from Francis J all deep respect for the dignity and care with which he decided the case.)

Where specialist information (‘expert evidence’: (say) medical, engineering, scientific) is needed by the court, parties ask for permission to adduce such evidence as is
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

Pillsbury—Matthew Sperry

Pillsbury—Matthew Sperry

Pillsbury expands private client and family office platform with Cadwalader partner hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll