header-logo header-logo

Lessons in costs from PXT

09 August 2024 / Julian Caddick
Issue: 8083 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs , Personal injury
printer mail-detail
185046
Don’t assume costs budgeting exemptions will apply in high value cases for children, says Julian Caddick
  • In most high value cases for children, costs budgeting is unlikely to be appropriate.
  • Considers the decision to order costs budgeting in PXT v Atere-Roberts, where a child brought a claim in excess of £10m.

Costs management rules automatically apply to all Part 7 multi-track cases but with some exceptions, one being where a claim is made in excess of £10m and commenced on or after 22 April 2014. A further exception is a claim made on or after 6 April 2016 on behalf of a child. The court nevertheless has discretion to order costs budgeting in other types of case, either on its own initiative or following an application by one of the parties.

In November 2022 in PXT v Atere-Roberts [2024] EWHC 1372 (KB), [2024] All ER (D) 51 (Jun), the claimant child brought a claim in excess of £10m. Costs budgeting did not automatically apply, but the defendants made

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll