header-logo header-logo

Lessons in harassment from down under

12 January 2024 / Mini Chandramouli
Issue: 8054 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
152801
Curbing workplace sexual harassment: Mini Chandramouli compares approaches in the UK & Australia
  • A comparative exploration of the approach in Australia and the UK to proactively curbing workplace sexual harassment.
  • Australian legislation treats sexual harassment as a health and safety issue.
  • Explores whether the UK position goes far enough, how it might develop based on the changes in Australia and the insights we can gain from Australia.

The introduction of the proactive duty to prevent sexual harassment in the workplace marks a meaningful shift in employer responsibilities in the UK and is certainly a clear step in the right direction.

However, when you drill down and examine the details of the amendments that were made to the Bill that became the Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act 2023 last October and compare them with the sweeping changes to the equivalent legislation of our Australian counterparts, there appears to be significant room for the UK to grow.

Is a limited proactive duty with the threat of an uplift on compensation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll