header-logo header-logo

Lessons in harassment from down under

12 January 2024 / Mini Chandramouli
Issue: 8054 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
152801
Curbing workplace sexual harassment: Mini Chandramouli compares approaches in the UK & Australia
  • A comparative exploration of the approach in Australia and the UK to proactively curbing workplace sexual harassment.
  • Australian legislation treats sexual harassment as a health and safety issue.
  • Explores whether the UK position goes far enough, how it might develop based on the changes in Australia and the insights we can gain from Australia.

The introduction of the proactive duty to prevent sexual harassment in the workplace marks a meaningful shift in employer responsibilities in the UK and is certainly a clear step in the right direction.

However, when you drill down and examine the details of the amendments that were made to the Bill that became the Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act 2023 last October and compare them with the sweeping changes to the equivalent legislation of our Australian counterparts, there appears to be significant room for the UK to grow.

Is a limited proactive duty with the threat of an uplift on compensation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll