header-logo header-logo

13 July 2017 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7754 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Lessons from the Luddites

nlj_7754_backpage

Today’s ‘Luddites’ need to find imaginative & effective solutions to opposing change, says Geoffrey Bindman

There is wide acceptance of the view that advances in computerisation and artificial intelligence will decimate professional employment in a very few years. Those who lose their jobs to machines will rightly be angry if they are consigned to poverty and indolence. Yet those who question the labour-saving benefits of new technology and seek to moderate the impact of these advances are sometimes pejoratively referred to as Luddites. Who were the Luddites?

Originally they were weavers and other textile workers in Northern England who, in the second decade of the 19th century, resisted the replacement of their employment by newly invented machines. The name came from an obscure and possibly mythical figure known as King Ludd or Ned Ludd, thought by some to have lived in Sherwood Forest at the same time as Robin Hood.

Ludd’s disciples, banding together at night with blackened faces, were machine-breakers. They attacked the mills which housed the new machines, destroying as many

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll