header-logo header-logo

13 July 2017 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7754 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Lessons from the Luddites

nlj_7754_backpage

Today’s ‘Luddites’ need to find imaginative & effective solutions to opposing change, says Geoffrey Bindman

There is wide acceptance of the view that advances in computerisation and artificial intelligence will decimate professional employment in a very few years. Those who lose their jobs to machines will rightly be angry if they are consigned to poverty and indolence. Yet those who question the labour-saving benefits of new technology and seek to moderate the impact of these advances are sometimes pejoratively referred to as Luddites. Who were the Luddites?

Originally they were weavers and other textile workers in Northern England who, in the second decade of the 19th century, resisted the replacement of their employment by newly invented machines. The name came from an obscure and possibly mythical figure known as King Ludd or Ned Ludd, thought by some to have lived in Sherwood Forest at the same time as Robin Hood.

Ludd’s disciples, banding together at night with blackened faces, were machine-breakers. They attacked the mills which housed the new machines, destroying as many

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
back-to-top-scroll