header-logo header-logo

Lessons in without prejudice

Peter Crampin QC & Simon Williams discuss the outcome & effect of Ofulue v Bossert

By its judgment in Ofulue v Bossert [2009] UKHL 16, [2009] All ER (D) 119 (Mar) the House of Lords has reaffirmed the public policy behind the “without prejudice” rule and made clear that, where an acknowledgment of title satisfying ss 29 and 30 of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980) is made in a statement of case, time runs from the date of, or the date of service of, the statement of case.

Their lordships had been invited to consider these two issues by Agnes Ofulue who, with her husband Emmanuel, had in September 2003 commenced proceedings against Erica Bossert for possession of a Victorian townhouse in London, of which they were the registered owners, on the grounds that she was a trespasser. They were met with the defence that their title had been extinguished by the adverse possession of Ms Bossert for more than 12 years pursuant to LA 1980, ss 15 and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll