header-logo header-logo

Lessons in without prejudice

Peter Crampin QC & Simon Williams discuss the outcome & effect of Ofulue v Bossert

By its judgment in Ofulue v Bossert [2009] UKHL 16, [2009] All ER (D) 119 (Mar) the House of Lords has reaffirmed the public policy behind the “without prejudice” rule and made clear that, where an acknowledgment of title satisfying ss 29 and 30 of the Limitation Act 1980 (LA 1980) is made in a statement of case, time runs from the date of, or the date of service of, the statement of case.

Their lordships had been invited to consider these two issues by Agnes Ofulue who, with her husband Emmanuel, had in September 2003 commenced proceedings against Erica Bossert for possession of a Victorian townhouse in London, of which they were the registered owners, on the grounds that she was a trespasser. They were met with the defence that their title had been extinguished by the adverse possession of Ms Bossert for more than 12 years pursuant to LA 1980, ss 15 and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll