header-logo header-logo

27 January 2017 / Paul Maharg
Issue: 7731 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Let’s get digital

nlj_7731_maharg

Paul Maharg explores the potential for AI & legal education

A free app called LawBot has been in the news recently. It is a “chatbot”, built by four Cambridge law students and sets out to advise victims of crime on their rights. Their initiative—they built it in their spare time—together with the idea of students organising their learning as a public good, goes to the core of what universities are about—indeed goes right back to the foundation of universities, and in two ways. First, it emphasises student achievement and agency. At the first medieval university, in Bologna in the 1080s, it wasn’t monks but students who ran the university. They developed the new universitas , negotiated with Bologna town council over their rights and obligations within the city, disciplined themselves, organised teaching and assessment, hired scholars, looked after student wellbeing, set up systems of text copying and dissemination to students who came from all over Europe to study there. Students were the university in ways that are almost inconceivable to us now.

Second, LawBot

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll