header-logo header-logo

29 January 2016 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Letter from America

nlj_7684_smith

Roger Smith reports on the US legal aid situation

This month, your tireless NLJ correspondent took himself to San Antonio, Texas. I do not, in general, recommend this destination. It contains an over-developed Riverwalk, an over-hyped Alamo, a bunch of military bases and the rest is pretty much carparks and hotels. However, for the last couple of years, it has been the home of an interesting conference on technology in the delivery of what we would call legal aid held by the rough equivalent of the Legal Aid Agency (the US Legal Services Corporation (LSC)). Attendance is an intriguing mix of techies, lawyers, managers and salespeople—making the success of opening conversational gambits to strangers more than usually random.

The big picture

The conference was addressed by two big beasts of the American legal establishment—immediate past American Bar Association president William Hubbard and the LSC’s own president, Jim Sandman. Both had a similar message on the impact of technology on the practice of law. It made him think, said Hubbard, revealing a rather surprising knowledge of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll