header-logo header-logo

29 January 2016 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Letter from America

nlj_7684_smith

Roger Smith reports on the US legal aid situation

This month, your tireless NLJ correspondent took himself to San Antonio, Texas. I do not, in general, recommend this destination. It contains an over-developed Riverwalk, an over-hyped Alamo, a bunch of military bases and the rest is pretty much carparks and hotels. However, for the last couple of years, it has been the home of an interesting conference on technology in the delivery of what we would call legal aid held by the rough equivalent of the Legal Aid Agency (the US Legal Services Corporation (LSC)). Attendance is an intriguing mix of techies, lawyers, managers and salespeople—making the success of opening conversational gambits to strangers more than usually random.

The big picture

The conference was addressed by two big beasts of the American legal establishment—immediate past American Bar Association president William Hubbard and the LSC’s own president, Jim Sandman. Both had a similar message on the impact of technology on the practice of law. It made him think, said Hubbard, revealing a rather surprising knowledge of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll