header-logo header-logo

Letter of the law

24 February 2012 / James Naylor
Issue: 7502 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A contract for the sale of land must incorporate all agreed terms, warns James Naylor

The recent case of Francis v F Berndes Ltd & Ors [2011] EWHC 3377 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 05 (Jan), provides a convenient reminder that a contract for the sale of land must incorporate all the terms that the parties have agreed upon and anything short of that benchmark will result in the failure of the agreement.

Facts

In Francis, a telephone offer was made to purchase a property for £50,000; such offer being subsequently orally accepted. An express oral agreement was thus achieved. There followed a letter that read, in part, as follows: “Following [the above] discussions…, I can confirm that we are prepared to sell the freehold of the Coolbury Club, workshop and flat for a purchase consideration of £50,000.”

However, the vendor subsequently declined to sell, occasioning the commencement of litigation between the parties. This was met by an application for summary judgment to dismiss the claim, on the basis that the letter

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll