header-logo header-logo

Letter of the law

24 February 2012 / James Naylor
Issue: 7502 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A contract for the sale of land must incorporate all agreed terms, warns James Naylor

The recent case of Francis v F Berndes Ltd & Ors [2011] EWHC 3377 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 05 (Jan), provides a convenient reminder that a contract for the sale of land must incorporate all the terms that the parties have agreed upon and anything short of that benchmark will result in the failure of the agreement.

Facts

In Francis, a telephone offer was made to purchase a property for £50,000; such offer being subsequently orally accepted. An express oral agreement was thus achieved. There followed a letter that read, in part, as follows: “Following [the above] discussions…, I can confirm that we are prepared to sell the freehold of the Coolbury Club, workshop and flat for a purchase consideration of £50,000.”

However, the vendor subsequently declined to sell, occasioning the commencement of litigation between the parties. This was met by an application for summary judgment to dismiss the claim, on the basis that the letter

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll