header-logo header-logo

02 October 2008
Issue: 7339 / Categories: Opinion , Public
printer mail-detail

A level playing field

Professional athletes should have the right to challenge their regulatory bodies, says John Cooper

Any lawyer who has appeared in front of a regulatory tribunal, perhaps more particularly if you are representing a sports person, will realise what a foreboding and alien environment it is, when compared to the normal principle of what constitutes a fair hearing and a just decision.

It is undesirable that the public courts should be suffocated by disputes which can properly be resolved within the regulatory framework, but if that is acknowledged as a sensible and practical way forward, it should also follow that the regulatory tribunals should be perceived as fair and without bias. But perhaps even more fundamental than that, the member should be allowed access to the disciplinary process to begin with—something which does not seem to be happening.

Sporting lawyers
The involvement of lawyers in the business of sports regulatory bodies has been increasing over the last few years or so. The approach is simple. Deal with disputes with members who have offended the contractual terms of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll