header-logo header-logo

Libel costs dropped as Leveson ends

03 March 2018
Categories: Legal News , Defamation
printer mail-detail

The Government has dropped Lord Leveson’s controversial proposal to make newspapers pay both sides’ legal costs for libel actions, whether they won or lost in court.

Culture Secretary Matt Hancock told MPs this week that the Leveson Inquiry has formally closed and that the government will seek to repeal the s40, Crime and Courts Act 2013 cost provision laws. Hancock said the ‘terms of reference’ for the second part of Leveson had ‘largely been met’ and the media landscape was ‘markedly different’ from that examined by Lord Leveson in 2011. Since then, newspaper circulation has fallen by about 30% while about 200 local newspapers have been forced to close, he said, and publishers are finding it hard to generate revenue online. Meanwhile, unregulated social media has risen dramatically as an information source.

However, Steven Heffer, head of media and privacy at Collyer Bristow, which acted for many of the celebrities affected by phone hacking, said: ‘It is astonishing that the government is abandoning it promises to victims of the phone-hacking scandal.

‘In 2012, David Cameron made personal promises to the victims of press abuse that the government would implement Leveson. It is a huge disappointment to them that this government has now dropped that completely.

‘At the time of Part 1 of the Leveson Inquiry, the government accepted that the system of press regulation was badly broken. Precious little has changed since then, but the government is now content to walk away without fixing it.

‘Part 2 of Leveson should have been a crucial part of examining unlawful actions by media organisations, and improper relationships between journalists and the police. Instead, the whole affair will be swept under the carpet.’

Categories: Legal News , Defamation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

Constantine Law—Alex Finch & Rebecca Tester

Constantine Law—Alex Finch & Rebecca Tester

Firm launches business immigration practice with dual partner hire

Freeths—Jane Dickers

Freeths—Jane Dickers

Scottish offering strengthened with dispute resolution partner hire in Glasgow

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
back-to-top-scroll