header-logo header-logo

01 April 2010
Issue: 7411 & 7412 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Libel reforms for the Internet age

Protection of investigative journalism high on the agenda

Justice Secretary Jack Straw has set out proposed reforms to protect investigative journalism and tackle the perceived threat of libel tourism.

A single publication rule will be introduced. Currently, each “hit” on a webpage produces a new publication and consequently gives rise to a new cause for action.

Under the proposed reforms, claimants will only be able to sue if they bring their action within one year of the date of the original publication. The courts will have discretionary powers to extend this period.

A statutory “public interest” defence could be introduced to protect the work of investigative journalists, scientists and NGOs. The government may also tighten up the rules about claims concerning publications outside of the EU in a bid to deter libel tourists.

Straw’s proposals follow the 23 March report of the Libel Working Group, a team of libel lawyers and newspaper editors established by the Ministry of Justice in January.

The reforms could be introduced in the next Parliament—after the General

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll