header-logo header-logo

20 October 2011
Issue: 7486 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Libraries

R (on the application of Bailey and others) v Brent London Borough Council [2011] EWHC 2572 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 123 (Oct)

The duty under s 7 of the Public Libraries and Museums Act 1964 (PLMA 1964) was to have regard to the “desirability” of securing provision of services by other “appropriate means”. Section 7 contained no duty to consider providing a subsidy if the authority did not consider that to be desirable or appropriate. However, the duty under s 7 of PLMA 1964 could not be fulfilled unless an assessment of the needs which the library service should meet had been undertaken.

The authority could not form a lawful or rational view of whether the service was comprehensive and efficient unless it had properly informed itself about those needs. If the claimants could show that something had gone seriously or obviously wrong in law in the information gathering or analysis process, they should have a remedy in the High Court. Otherwise, it should be left to the secretary of state.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll