header-logo header-logo

29 September 2021
Issue: 7950 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Life at the Bar can be grim

Nearly one in three barristers (30%) have reported being bullied, harassed and/or discriminated against at work within the previous two years, research has found

The Bar Council’s 2021 Working Lives Survey, published this week, uncovered the devastating figure, up from 21% in the last survey, in 2017.

In response to the findings, the Bar Council said tackling bullying, harassment and discrimination would continue to be a priority. It has set up an anonymous reporting app Talk to Spot, is working with the senior judiciary to stamp out judicial bullying of barristers and published a Bar Council Guide on judicial bullying in 2019.

Nearly two-thirds (63%) reported the pandemic has had a negative impact on their practice, with criminal barristers faring worst overall (79%). On new ways of working post-pandemic, the majority want to work in a different way―only 23% opposed change. Of those in favour of change, 60% want more remote working and 42% want more flexible working patterns.

The Bar Council is currently drawing up a flexible working guide for the Bar.

Government plans to shrink the backlog through Extended Operating Hours in courts found little favour with barristers― only 9% approved.

Derek Sweeting QC, Chair of the Bar Council, said: ‘Work has already begun in the last year or so to tackle the issue of bullying, harassment and discrimination at the Bar, and we are making the Bar a more accessible profession in terms of its working practices.

‘The Bar Council’s Modernising the Bar programme lies at the heart of this effort.’

The Modernising the Bar programme focuses on women and under-represented groups, aiming to: make distribution of work fairer, including briefing practices, marketing opportunities and monitoring; and improve practice management, including supporting new and returning barristers and supporting progression.

Some 3,479 barristers responded to the survey.

Issue: 7950 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Seddons GSC—Ben Marks

Partner joins residential real estate team

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Winckworth Sherwood—Shazia Bashir

Social housing team announces partner appointment

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

University of Manchester: The LLM driving tech-focused career growth

Manchester’s online LLM has accelerated career progression for its graduates

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll