header-logo header-logo

15 February 2023
Issue: 8013 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Career focus
printer mail-detail

Life at the employed Bar

Employed barristers have higher levels of wellbeing, are more diverse and enjoy greater flexibility and work/life balance than the self-employed Bar, the Bar Council has found.

However, it also discovered the employed Bar experiences bullying and harassment at similar levels to the whole Bar, has far fewer King’s Counsel, and is concerned about career progression and income. 

Of the 17,000 barristers currently in practice, more than 3,000 (18%) are employed. The Bar Council report, ‘Life at the employed Bar’, published last week, is based on analysis of data on the demographics and working lives of employed barristers as well as focus group discussions, and makes nine recommendations.

Stuart Alford KC, chair of the Bar Council employed barristers’ committee, said: ‘The recommendations we’re adopting provide a clear steer on things we must improve: better information about the benefits of a career at the employed Bar, targeted support on career progression—particularly when it comes to judicial appointments for employed barristers, a greater focus on tackling bullying and harassment within the employed arm of profession, and support in developing networks for employed barristers throughout England & Wales.’

The report paints a picture of employed barristers’ working lives. More than half work in the public sector and nearly a quarter work in legal firms. The main areas are crime (34%), commercial and financial services (14%) and public law (13%).

The employed Bar is more diverse, with women making up 49% (compared to 37% of the self-employed Bar) and nearly one in five from an ethnic minority background (compared to 15% of the self-employed Bar).

Only 52 employed barristers (2.6%) are King’s Counsel.

The vast majority, 86%, report a sense of collaboration and co-operation in their workplace. However, 31% have personally experienced bullying, discrimination or harassment at work. Women, people from ethnic minority backgrounds, and those who work in solicitors’ firms are more likely to have been subjected to this.

Nick Vinneal KC, Bar Council chair, said: ‘This report provides a clear way forward for the Bar Council, working with others, to promote, champion, and support employed barristers as members of our One Bar.’

Issue: 8013 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Career focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll