header-logo header-logo

Life in Court: some practical guidance

22 January 2009 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 7353 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Janna Purdie on how practitioners can make life easier for themselves in front of the judiciary

Court etiquette - Jacobs v Skidmore Owings [2008] All ER (D) 258 (Nov)

All practitioners will have encountered difficulties in providing sensible time estimates to the courts for hearings. However, just because it can be difficult or the estimate fluctuates over time does not mean that the requirement to inform the court can be ignored.
While failures to advise the court of changes to time estimates may come from a fear that the court will adjourn the application, this sort of behaviour disrupts the rest of the court service and is discourteous. Judges will invariably try to accommodate applications which have been listed.
In Jacobs v Skidmore, the time estimate of two hours, when the application took three days, was obviously inadequate and was criticised by Mr Justice Coulson. While the judge acknowledged that it is sometimes difficult for parties to agree a reasonable time estimate at the time of
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll