header-logo header-logo

22 January 2009 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 7353 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Profession , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Life in Court: some practical guidance

Janna Purdie on how practitioners can make life easier for themselves in front of the judiciary

Court etiquette - Jacobs v Skidmore Owings [2008] All ER (D) 258 (Nov)

All practitioners will have encountered difficulties in providing sensible time estimates to the courts for hearings. However, just because it can be difficult or the estimate fluctuates over time does not mean that the requirement to inform the court can be ignored.
While failures to advise the court of changes to time estimates may come from a fear that the court will adjourn the application, this sort of behaviour disrupts the rest of the court service and is discourteous. Judges will invariably try to accommodate applications which have been listed.
In Jacobs v Skidmore, the time estimate of two hours, when the application took three days, was obviously inadequate and was criticised by Mr Justice Coulson. While the judge acknowledged that it is sometimes difficult for parties to agree a reasonable time estimate at the time of
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll