header-logo header-logo

19 January 2024 / Elizabeth Rimmer
Issue: 8055 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Life in the law: Making it work

Elizabeth Rimmer explains the importance of understanding psychosocial risk in legal workplaces

Psychosocial risks refer to a broad range of factors within the workplace that have the potential to affect employees’ psychological and physical health. These risks arise from the interaction between the work environment, the nature of the work and workplace relationships.

The World Health Organization has identified common risks to mental health at work: many of these are present in demanding and high-pressured workplaces such as law and can lead to work-related stress and burnout. Common examples of these risks in legal workplaces include the following.

  • High workload and time pressure—heavy workloads, tight deadlines and pressure to meet targets can lead to stress and overwhelm.
  • Nature of the work—legal work is complex and can be emotionally demanding in practice areas such as crime, family, immigration and personal injury.
  • Poor work/life balance—working long hours and meeting the expectations of always being available to clients can lead to stress and strained personal relationships.
  • Organisational culture—an unsupportive culture coupled
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll