header-logo header-logo

30 June 2011 / Sarah Lowe
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Life insurance

How does a state protect the right to life, asks Sarah Lowe

The issue of what is required by a state in order to protect the right to life in accordance with Art 2 of the European Convention of Human Rights (the Convention) has been litigated extensively over the years in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and domestic courts.

The events at the end of the last century in Northern Ireland have given rise to a plethora of case law around what is required in order to comply with Art 2. One of the leading cases, McCann v UK (1995) 21 EHRR 97 concerned the killing of three suspected IRA terrorists by SAS soldiers. The ECtHR held that in order to protect life in accordance with Art 2 there should be an effective official investigation into deaths which occur as a result of the use of lethal force by the state.

What constituted an effective official investigation was explored further in the cases of Jordan 2003 37 EHRR 52, Kelly v UK

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll