header-logo header-logo

30 June 2011 / Sarah Lowe
Issue: 7472 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Life insurance

How does a state protect the right to life, asks Sarah Lowe

The issue of what is required by a state in order to protect the right to life in accordance with Art 2 of the European Convention of Human Rights (the Convention) has been litigated extensively over the years in the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and domestic courts.

The events at the end of the last century in Northern Ireland have given rise to a plethora of case law around what is required in order to comply with Art 2. One of the leading cases, McCann v UK (1995) 21 EHRR 97 concerned the killing of three suspected IRA terrorists by SAS soldiers. The ECtHR held that in order to protect life in accordance with Art 2 there should be an effective official investigation into deaths which occur as a result of the use of lethal force by the state.

What constituted an effective official investigation was explored further in the cases of Jordan 2003 37 EHRR 52, Kelly v UK

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll