header-logo header-logo

Fraud victims: light at the end of the tunnel?

24 May 2024 / Jon Felce , Rosie Wild
Issue: 8072 / Categories: Features , Fraud , Financial services litigation
printer mail-detail
174021
A recent case offers hope for victims of APP fraud. Jon Felce & Rosie Wild explain the ruling and its ramifications
  • Payment services providers (PSPs) may face liability for failing to take reasonable steps to retrieve or recover monies transferred after an APP fraud.
  • The decision is subject to appeal and was made in the context of an interim application, so the existence and scope of any duty will need to be determined at trial.
  • In the meantime, PSPs will need to consider what steps they need to take to protect themselves against potential liability.

Banks and other financial institutions can sometimes be slow off the mark in reacting to frauds once they are alerted to potential wrongdoing. This can manifest in a failure, once on notice of the potential fraud, to take sufficient steps to seek to stop sums being dissipated and to recover sums fraudulently misappropriated. Reacting promptly can sometimes mean the difference between locking down and recovering funds, and those funds

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DAC Beachcroft—Ben Daniels

DAC Beachcroft—Ben Daniels

Firm elects new senior partner to lead next phase of growth

Taylor Rose—Amarjit Ryatt

Taylor Rose—Amarjit Ryatt

Partner appointed head of family and divorce

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Browne Jacobson—Adam Berry & Adam Culy

Financial and professional risks team expand with dual partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll