header-logo header-logo

06 February 2026
Issue: 8148 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Artificial intelligence , Legal services , Fees , Equality
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: AI comes for the billable hour

241895
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’

McDougall says AI doesn’t merely speed up legal work; it destroys the fiction that time equals value. Tasks that once took hours can now be done in minutes, making billing by endurance ‘absurd’ and potentially perverse.

The shift, he suggests, could also loosen one of law’s most stubborn gender choke points, replacing presenteeism with judgement, risk management and leadership.

Sceptics have ‘heard this before’, McDougall concedes, but this time lawyers aren’t being asked to change their incentives—they’re being overtaken. Once clients experience faster, cheaper, high-quality output, ‘the clock cannot be turned back’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys—James Paterson

Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters Private Equity expertise with the appointment of James Paterson

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons—Samuel Flower

Ellisons strengthens Rural Affairs team with senior appointment

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley—Carl Hotton

Sidley adds insurance mergers and acquisitions partner to London office

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll