header-logo header-logo

12 January 2018 / Brice Dickson
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Features , In Court
printer mail-detail

In the line of duty: a year in the Supreme Court

nlj_7776_dickson

The Supreme Court in 2017. Brice Dickson reviews the personnel, judgments & output

2017 was an eventful year for the UK Supreme Court. It began with 11 Justices in post, each deliberating on Gina Miller’s claim that Article 50 of the Treaty for European Union should be triggered by Parliament and not by government. They held in her favour by 8 to 3 ([2017] UKSC 5), affirming the decision of the Divisional Court. The year ended with three new Justices in post, plus a different President and Deputy President.

Lord Neuberger, the outgoing President, retired in September, four months short of his 70th birthday. Lord Clarke retired at the same time, eight months short of his 75th birthday. Lord Neuberger can sit as a member of the supplementary panel of retired judges until 2023. Lord Toulson retired in September 2016 but sat as a supplementary judge on six occasions in early 2017. He delivered the Court’s sole judgment in two cases. Sadly, while undergoing heart surgery in June,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll