header-logo header-logo

In the line of fire

18 June 2009 / Glynis Craig
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Glynis Craig says all soldiers have human rights

For the first time a domestic court has considered whether members of the British Armed Services serving abroad are under the jurisdiction of the UK for the purposes of the Human Rights Act (HRA 1998).

On 19 May 2009, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Secretary of State for Defence v R (Catherine Smith) and HM Assistant Deputy Coroner for Oxfordshire and Equality and Human Rights Commission (Intervener) [2009] EWCA Civ 441, [2009] All ER (D) 152 (May).

The Equality and Human Rights Commission intervened in the case to argue that, as UK soldiers are serving abroad under the jurisdiction of the UK government, they should also receive the protection granted to other British citizens.

The court found that these soldiers were protected by the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) and HRA 1998 whether they were physically on an armed forces base or elsewhere. As a result, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) will have to provide

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll