header-logo header-logo

14 August 2015 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

LIP service

nlj_7665_solon

Mark Solon highlights the potential pitfalls when litigants in person instruct expert witnesses

The rise in number of DIY litigants appearing before the courts without having had advice from a lawyer and without representation, has been fuelled by the soaring cost of litigation at one end of the market and at the other, due to cuts to legal aid, that have meant fewer people are eligible for public funding.

Having unrepresented people, whether in civil, criminal or commercial proceedings, generally increases the length of cases, as unrepresented parties are less familiar with court procedure and practice, they will be more likely to focus on legally irrelevant matters and naturally often allow their emotions to get the better of them.

This had the effect of increasing the cost of litigation, the opposite effect that the cuts and reforms are intended to have.

Heavy burden

The trend has an impact on all other parties working in the court system, from the lawyers (where they are instructed) representing the opposing parties to the judges hearing the cases. Judges

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll