header-logo header-logo

14 August 2015 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

LIP service

nlj_7665_solon

Mark Solon highlights the potential pitfalls when litigants in person instruct expert witnesses

The rise in number of DIY litigants appearing before the courts without having had advice from a lawyer and without representation, has been fuelled by the soaring cost of litigation at one end of the market and at the other, due to cuts to legal aid, that have meant fewer people are eligible for public funding.

Having unrepresented people, whether in civil, criminal or commercial proceedings, generally increases the length of cases, as unrepresented parties are less familiar with court procedure and practice, they will be more likely to focus on legally irrelevant matters and naturally often allow their emotions to get the better of them.

This had the effect of increasing the cost of litigation, the opposite effect that the cuts and reforms are intended to have.

Heavy burden

The trend has an impact on all other parties working in the court system, from the lawyers (where they are instructed) representing the opposing parties to the judges hearing the cases. Judges

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll