header-logo header-logo

LIP service

14 August 2015 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7665 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7665_solon

Mark Solon highlights the potential pitfalls when litigants in person instruct expert witnesses

The rise in number of DIY litigants appearing before the courts without having had advice from a lawyer and without representation, has been fuelled by the soaring cost of litigation at one end of the market and at the other, due to cuts to legal aid, that have meant fewer people are eligible for public funding.

Having unrepresented people, whether in civil, criminal or commercial proceedings, generally increases the length of cases, as unrepresented parties are less familiar with court procedure and practice, they will be more likely to focus on legally irrelevant matters and naturally often allow their emotions to get the better of them.

This had the effect of increasing the cost of litigation, the opposite effect that the cuts and reforms are intended to have.

Heavy burden

The trend has an impact on all other parties working in the court system, from the lawyers (where they are instructed) representing the opposing parties to the judges hearing the cases. Judges

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll