header-logo header-logo

20 September 2012
Issue: 7530 / Categories: Features , Training & education , Profession
printer mail-detail

Listen & learn

Lucy Chakaodza explains how legal professionals can expand their skills & choices through ADR training

Judicial methods of determining disputes has long been the orthodox method of resolving  conflict in western society with dispute resolution processes such as mediation, arbitration and conciliation being labelled as ‘alternative’.

Nevertheless, the growth in the training and provision of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods to resolve conflicts by a number of professional bodies and institutions has led to widespread use by practitioners in a variety of disciplines including lawyers.

Lawyers can play a key role when resolving a conflict using alternative dispute resolution processes. For any lawyer seeking to embark on formal construction adjudication or arbitration training, the climate is certainly favourable, if not competitive.

Training is available from a number of professional bodies and institutes. The Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) enables those undertaking courses to not only gain a valuable qualification that complements their existing legal skills, but to experience the benefits of becoming a CIArb member.

Dennis Fry, Domestic and International Arbitration Course Director at CIArb,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll