header-logo header-logo

Litigating Brexit at the eleventh hour

16 October 2018 / David Wolchover
Categories: Features , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail
nlj_7809_brexit

David Wolchover considers two impending challenges

  • Unreasonable actions, unlawful overspending and excluded expats: could it be possible that the outcomes of two upcoming lawsuits might cause a domino effect leading to the cancellation of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU?

With the Chequers proposals all but rejected at Salzburg by the 27 member states of the European Union (EU27) mounting fears are turning to panic that an impasse in the Brexit negotiation process will lead to the UK ‘crashing out’ of the EU without a deal on 29 March 2019. Indeed, the government’s perceived lack of direction may be shifting opinion significantly towards remaining in the EU (see Michael Savage, ‘More than 100 seats that backed Brexit now want to stay in EU’, The Observer, 11 August 2018; Nicholas Cecil, ‘Poll of polls: now we want to stay in,’ Evening Standard, 8 October, 2018). While the general thrust of polling suggests a high count in favour of, at the very least, a second referendum

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll