header-logo header-logo

25 January 2013 / David Greene
Issue: 7545 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Litigating in the dark

Pushing the Jackson reforms through at break neck speed is in no-one’s interest, says David Greene

After the long debate the profession has accepted that the Jackson and accompanying reforms are going to become law and now seeks to prepare for the radical changes to be introduced in April. The effect of them will be widespread, particularly when combined with changes in the scope of legal aid, to the Road Traffic Accident (RTA) portal and costs recovery. The day for argument about the effect that they have on access to justice is over. They are now inevitable and everyone is seeking to approach them in a positive fashion. The position in relation to that approach has, however, become quite ridiculous. 

The changes are to have effect from 1 April although there will be differing commencement dates for different provisions. Lest anyone thinks otherwise, the changes are dramatic for both clients and solicitors:

  • For claimants there will be a steep increase in the cost of access to the courts; and
  • for defendants there will
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll