header-logo header-logo

25 January 2013 / David Greene
Issue: 7545 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Litigating in the dark

Pushing the Jackson reforms through at break neck speed is in no-one’s interest, says David Greene

After the long debate the profession has accepted that the Jackson and accompanying reforms are going to become law and now seeks to prepare for the radical changes to be introduced in April. The effect of them will be widespread, particularly when combined with changes in the scope of legal aid, to the Road Traffic Accident (RTA) portal and costs recovery. The day for argument about the effect that they have on access to justice is over. They are now inevitable and everyone is seeking to approach them in a positive fashion. The position in relation to that approach has, however, become quite ridiculous. 

The changes are to have effect from 1 April although there will be differing commencement dates for different provisions. Lest anyone thinks otherwise, the changes are dramatic for both clients and solicitors:

  • For claimants there will be a steep increase in the cost of access to the courts; and
  • for defendants there will
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll