header-logo header-logo

10 September 2020 / Georgina Squire
Issue: 7901 / Categories: Features , Litigation funding , Profession
printer mail-detail

Litigation funding: when the Arkin cap no longer fits

27166
Georgina Squire reflects on the judicial evolution in the approach to the Arkin cap & the rise of start-ups

The litigation funding market is experiencing an opportunity for growth. A raft of new claims is emerging while many claimants are struggling with cashflow in their businesses. Claimants are, more and more, looking to take the funding of litigation off balance sheet and bring in third party funders to assist their cashflow.

The outbreak of COVID-19 has fuelled this market direction as claimants are under more financial pressure than ever before. However, on the bright side, litigation funding is robustly developing through the uncertain environment by providing claimants with new financing solutions. As a result, there is a raft of funders providing access to the English court system through competitively priced litigation funding. This means that litigation funding is now a more practical solution and risk adverse option for any business, if it is prepared to sacrifice some of its recovery to the funder in exchange

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll