header-logo header-logo

17 January 2019 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7824 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Litigation leopards & a year of discontent

Dominic Regan shares his reflections on 2018—one hell of a year for civil litigators

 

2018 was one hell of a year for civil litigators. Indeed, a number of reported decisions have arisen because of ignorance about fundamentals where people really ought to know better.

The big procedural reform just kicking in is the disclosure pilot scheme being run out nationwide in the business and property courts. It is a bold attempt to curb expensive disclosure activity. Change was precipitated by clients who were appalled at the futility of it all. Confronted by a threat to take their disputes elsewhere for determination, perhaps by way of arbitration, steps were taken to placate the aggrieved. Ed Crosse, immediate past president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, and many others have done so much to make things better. Let us all hope it works.

Troublesome

Service of proceedings has always been a troublesome matter, particularly where it is left until the last minute. The Supreme Court divided 3-2 in Barton v Wright

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll