header-logo header-logo

Litigation without lawyers

26 September 2019 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7857 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Legal services , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

The small claims system is too complicated for non-lawyers & needs simplifying, says Peter Thompson QC

The law by which civil claims are administered is drafted by lawyers, interpreted by lawyers and applied and enforced by lawyers. You have to be qualified as a lawyer to understand it. Most of the individual litigants for whose benefit the system has been established are unable to afford a lawyer and, in the case of money claims for no more than £10,000, are discouraged from engaging one. These claims are known as small claims, and they make up over half of the total turnover of the courts. They are brought and defended by litigants in person.

No legal frills

Currently concern is expressed by the judiciary that litigants in person are upsetting the administration of justice by misunderstanding court orders and directions and by making misconceived applications and appeals. They are not acting maliciously, but are thrashing about making mistakes through their lack of legal understanding. So how has this come about and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll