header-logo header-logo

Litigation without lawyers

26 September 2019 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7857 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Legal services , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

The small claims system is too complicated for non-lawyers & needs simplifying, says Peter Thompson QC

The law by which civil claims are administered is drafted by lawyers, interpreted by lawyers and applied and enforced by lawyers. You have to be qualified as a lawyer to understand it. Most of the individual litigants for whose benefit the system has been established are unable to afford a lawyer and, in the case of money claims for no more than £10,000, are discouraged from engaging one. These claims are known as small claims, and they make up over half of the total turnover of the courts. They are brought and defended by litigants in person.

No legal frills

Currently concern is expressed by the judiciary that litigants in person are upsetting the administration of justice by misunderstanding court orders and directions and by making misconceived applications and appeals. They are not acting maliciously, but are thrashing about making mistakes through their lack of legal understanding. So how has this come about and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll