header-logo header-logo

Litigation without lawyers

26 September 2019 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7857 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Legal services , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

The small claims system is too complicated for non-lawyers & needs simplifying, says Peter Thompson QC

The law by which civil claims are administered is drafted by lawyers, interpreted by lawyers and applied and enforced by lawyers. You have to be qualified as a lawyer to understand it. Most of the individual litigants for whose benefit the system has been established are unable to afford a lawyer and, in the case of money claims for no more than £10,000, are discouraged from engaging one. These claims are known as small claims, and they make up over half of the total turnover of the courts. They are brought and defended by litigants in person.

No legal frills

Currently concern is expressed by the judiciary that litigants in person are upsetting the administration of justice by misunderstanding court orders and directions and by making misconceived applications and appeals. They are not acting maliciously, but are thrashing about making mistakes through their lack of legal understanding. So how has this come about and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll