header-logo header-logo

31 October 2013
Issue: 7582 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Litigators speak up about Jackson

NLJ / LSLA survey of litigators reveals widespread concerns over reform impact

Lawyers have expressed concerns about rising costs, damages-based agreements (DBAs) and access to justice, in the first major poll of civil litigators since the implementation of the Jackson Reforms.

The London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) and NLJ combined to poll the 1,500 individual LSLA members whose practices range from large City litigation teams to smaller, niche firms.

A resounding 93% of those polled said access to justice had not increased—one of the principal aims of the reforms, which were implemented in April. Nearly 60% said the new rules on disclosure and new budgeting measures will drive up costs.

The survey is the first in a planned series by LSLA and NLJ to examine the ongoing impact of the Jackson Reforms, how these influence behaviour among litigation teams and whether, over time, they deliver the improvements Lord Justice Jackson sought. The full results of the first survey can be accessed at www.newlawjournal.co.uk.

Francesca Kaye, president of LSLA and partner at Russell-Cooke LLP, says the survey confirms some “early misgivings”.

“More than six months on from the implementation of LASPO, we’re beginning to see how the reforms are working in practice,” she says.

“The next six months will provide even more interesting intelligence as cases work their way through the system under the new rules and we see the first Court of Appeal decisions. We were concerned in April that some of the rules and regulations had been rushed through and poorly drafted.  

“A clear example is the concern surrounding the lack of clarity in the DBA regulations. Despite the indication that the regulations would be reviewed it is little wonder that litigators have stayed well clear in the meantime.” 

Jan Miller, NLJ editor, says: “This first poll of litigators has provided some fascinating insights into the day-in-day-out impact of Jackson. This ongoing collaboration with LSLA’s wide membership gives us a ringside seat in charting the changing attitudes and trends stemming from the Jackson Reforms.

 

Issue: 7582 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll