header-logo header-logo

Litigators speak up about Jackson

31 October 2013
Issue: 7582 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

NLJ / LSLA survey of litigators reveals widespread concerns over reform impact

Lawyers have expressed concerns about rising costs, damages-based agreements (DBAs) and access to justice, in the first major poll of civil litigators since the implementation of the Jackson Reforms.

The London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) and NLJ combined to poll the 1,500 individual LSLA members whose practices range from large City litigation teams to smaller, niche firms.

A resounding 93% of those polled said access to justice had not increased—one of the principal aims of the reforms, which were implemented in April. Nearly 60% said the new rules on disclosure and new budgeting measures will drive up costs.

The survey is the first in a planned series by LSLA and NLJ to examine the ongoing impact of the Jackson Reforms, how these influence behaviour among litigation teams and whether, over time, they deliver the improvements Lord Justice Jackson sought. The full results of the first survey can be accessed at www.newlawjournal.co.uk.

Francesca Kaye, president of LSLA and partner at Russell-Cooke LLP, says the survey confirms some “early misgivings”.

“More than six months on from the implementation of LASPO, we’re beginning to see how the reforms are working in practice,” she says.

“The next six months will provide even more interesting intelligence as cases work their way through the system under the new rules and we see the first Court of Appeal decisions. We were concerned in April that some of the rules and regulations had been rushed through and poorly drafted.  

“A clear example is the concern surrounding the lack of clarity in the DBA regulations. Despite the indication that the regulations would be reviewed it is little wonder that litigators have stayed well clear in the meantime.” 

Jan Miller, NLJ editor, says: “This first poll of litigators has provided some fascinating insights into the day-in-day-out impact of Jackson. This ongoing collaboration with LSLA’s wide membership gives us a ringside seat in charting the changing attitudes and trends stemming from the Jackson Reforms.

 

Issue: 7582 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
back-to-top-scroll