header-logo header-logo

31 October 2013
Issue: 7582 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Litigators speak up about Jackson

NLJ / LSLA survey of litigators reveals widespread concerns over reform impact

Lawyers have expressed concerns about rising costs, damages-based agreements (DBAs) and access to justice, in the first major poll of civil litigators since the implementation of the Jackson Reforms.

The London Solicitors Litigation Association (LSLA) and NLJ combined to poll the 1,500 individual LSLA members whose practices range from large City litigation teams to smaller, niche firms.

A resounding 93% of those polled said access to justice had not increased—one of the principal aims of the reforms, which were implemented in April. Nearly 60% said the new rules on disclosure and new budgeting measures will drive up costs.

The survey is the first in a planned series by LSLA and NLJ to examine the ongoing impact of the Jackson Reforms, how these influence behaviour among litigation teams and whether, over time, they deliver the improvements Lord Justice Jackson sought. The full results of the first survey can be accessed at www.newlawjournal.co.uk.

Francesca Kaye, president of LSLA and partner at Russell-Cooke LLP, says the survey confirms some “early misgivings”.

“More than six months on from the implementation of LASPO, we’re beginning to see how the reforms are working in practice,” she says.

“The next six months will provide even more interesting intelligence as cases work their way through the system under the new rules and we see the first Court of Appeal decisions. We were concerned in April that some of the rules and regulations had been rushed through and poorly drafted.  

“A clear example is the concern surrounding the lack of clarity in the DBA regulations. Despite the indication that the regulations would be reviewed it is little wonder that litigators have stayed well clear in the meantime.” 

Jan Miller, NLJ editor, says: “This first poll of litigators has provided some fascinating insights into the day-in-day-out impact of Jackson. This ongoing collaboration with LSLA’s wide membership gives us a ringside seat in charting the changing attitudes and trends stemming from the Jackson Reforms.

 

Issue: 7582 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll