header-logo header-logo

Liverpool FC saga

21 October 2010
Issue: 7438 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The US owners of the Boston Red Sox finally signed a deal to buy Liverpool FC last week after a legal stand-off. The £300m deal will allow the club to pay back its debts to RBS, its main creditor.

The US owners of the Boston Red Sox finally signed a deal to buy Liverpool FC last week after a legal stand-off. The £300m deal will allow the club to pay back its debts to RBS, its main creditor.

Tom Hicks and George Gillett, the club’s previous owners, claim the club’s value is closer to £600m and tried to stop the sale by replacing board members. When RBS obtained an injunction in the High Court to prevent this, the pair obtained an injunctive action from a Texas court. RBS then secured a declaration from Mr Justice Floyd that the Texas proceedings had no locus standi. Hicks and Gillett withdrew the Texas order the following day.
However, Hicks and Gillett are reported to be considering bringing a claim in damages for up to £1.6bn.

Andrew Nixon, associate, Thomas Eggar Sports Group, says: “Hicks and Gillett will seek to argue that the board failed to discharge its fiduciary duties to the shareholders by apparently refusing to look at other bids for the football club. They will also claim that the deal undervalues the asset, and by selling for £300m fails to secure the best possible price. To succeed, Hicks and Gillett will not only have to show that the board acted with blinkers but that the club is worth significantly more than £300m. Read more @ www.newlawjournal.co.uk

Issue: 7438 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll