header-logo header-logo

20 May 2021
Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

LNB News: ATLEU report on major barriers faced by exploitation and slavery survivors

The Anti Trafficking and Labour Exploitation Unit (ATLEU) has published a report stating survivors of exploitation, trafficking and slavery are still facing major hurdles in accessing legal advice.

Lexis®Library update: The researchers worked closely with immigration lawyers and support providers who had first-hand experience of working with victims of exploitation, who spoke about their experience of legal aid within England whilst tacking these cases.

The key findings of the report demonstrate:

  • survivors of exploitation face great difficulties in access to legal aid/advice whilst in the UK, despite it being a key part to recovery and securing their rights
  • the funding around legal aid has been labelled as inadequate to deliver a quality service to survivors, which in turn discourages many lawyers from taking on complex modern slavery cases
  • it is paramount to have access to good quality legal advice when considering survivor support and securing immigration status

The report urges the UK government to change the way legal aid is funded and has suggested a way to switch payments available to lawyers, when working on immigration cases such as these, to an hourly basis. ATLEU also recommended giving victims of modern slavery with an insecure immigration status an automatic (minimum) one-year Leave to Remain.

The full report can be seen here.

Source: ATLEU report: Survivors still facing major barriers to accessing legal advice.

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 19 May 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll