header-logo header-logo

LNB News: Bar Council condemns sanctions on Essex Court barristers following Uyghur opinion

28 April 2021
Categories: Legal News , International justice , Sanctions , Human rights
printer mail-detail
The Bar Council has published a statement condemning the sanctions announced by the government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) against certain barristers and their ‘immediate families’. 

Lexis®Library update: The statement has been published on behalf of the four professional bodies of barristers and advocates of the UK and Ireland. The Bar Council states that the imposition of sanctions on lawyers for providing a legal opinion contravenes the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers and that the naming of a barristers’ chambers within the sanctions is a further indiscriminate attack on legal professionals, which is inconsistent with respect for the rule of law.

The statement follows the retaliatory sanctions against the UK on 26 March 2021 after the UK sanctioned China for 'gross human rights violations' against Uyghurs and other minorities in Xinjiang. In late January 2021, four members of Essex Court Chambers had written a legal opinion, which was later published publicly, on legal issues arising from the alleged human rights violations. See further: China retaliates by sanctioning UK, barristers chamber.

In its statement, the Bar Council calls on the PRC government to review the sanctions, which are ‘a threat to the global legal community’. It also calls on other Bar associations to condemn the imposition of these sanctions. 

Source: Statement of the Four Bars on PRC Government sanctions against barristers

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 27 April 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll