header-logo header-logo

28 April 2021
Categories: Legal News , International justice , Sanctions , Human rights
printer mail-detail

LNB News: Bar Council condemns sanctions on Essex Court barristers following Uyghur opinion

The Bar Council has published a statement condemning the sanctions announced by the government of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) against certain barristers and their ‘immediate families’. 

Lexis®Library update: The statement has been published on behalf of the four professional bodies of barristers and advocates of the UK and Ireland. The Bar Council states that the imposition of sanctions on lawyers for providing a legal opinion contravenes the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers and that the naming of a barristers’ chambers within the sanctions is a further indiscriminate attack on legal professionals, which is inconsistent with respect for the rule of law.

The statement follows the retaliatory sanctions against the UK on 26 March 2021 after the UK sanctioned China for 'gross human rights violations' against Uyghurs and other minorities in Xinjiang. In late January 2021, four members of Essex Court Chambers had written a legal opinion, which was later published publicly, on legal issues arising from the alleged human rights violations. See further: China retaliates by sanctioning UK, barristers chamber.

In its statement, the Bar Council calls on the PRC government to review the sanctions, which are ‘a threat to the global legal community’. It also calls on other Bar associations to condemn the imposition of these sanctions. 

Source: Statement of the Four Bars on PRC Government sanctions against barristers

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 27 April 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll