header-logo header-logo

30 June 2021
Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

LNB news: Beyond Brexit—Commons publishes briefing on UK-Australia FTA

The House of Commons Library has published a research briefing on the UK-Australia Free Trade Agreement (FTA) following the announcement of the FTA on 15 June 2021
Lexis®Library update: The briefing provides information on what is covered by the FTA, the effects on agriculture and how Parliament will scrutinise the agreement. It also details the reactions of various stakeholders, such as the National Farmers’ Union (NFU), as well as business groups and the devolved administrations.

The FTA provides that all tariffs on UK exports to Australia, and on the vast majority of imports from Australia, will be removed, provided rules of origin are met. Tariffs for certain products, such as beef, sugar and dairy, will be removed in a phased manner.

The NFU has raised concerns about the FTA’s impact on UK farmers. It fears that an increase in imports from Australia could undercut UK farmers. The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals also raised concerns, saying the deal risked ‘imports produced to lower animal welfare standards than those permitted here’. The Northern Ireland Agriculture Minister stated that the FTA was a threat to local farmers, and the Scottish Government has called for tariff rate quotas to control imports in sensitive sectors, such as beef and sheep meat. The Welsh Government has stated that it is awaiting the ‘exact details’ of the FTA, and that it will then publish a report on its potential impact on Wales.

Further barriers have been removed in relation to investment, digital trade, mobility and other sectors.

Source: UK-Australia free trade agreement

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 29 June 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/

Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll