header-logo header-logo

04 February 2021
Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

LNB news: Brexit Bulletin—UK government to establish new Taskforce on Innovation, Growth and Regulatory Reform (TIGRR)

Lexis®Library update: The Prime Minister’s Office has published a policy paper announcing the launch of a new Taskforce on Innovation, Growth and Regulatory Reform (TIGRR) to ‘identify and develop proposals across a range of areas that will drive innovation and competitiveness, reduce barriers to start-ups and scale-ups, create opportunities for innovation to make the most of cutting-edge technologies, and support growth and dynamism right across the UK economy’
Tasked with informing and challenging government proposals associated with the UK’s ‘newfound regulatory freedoms’, the TIGRR will report directly to the Prime Minister with access to Civil Service support. Outside of the TIGRR’s scope will be the government’s broader ‘Better Regulation Framework’, including deregulatory targets and associated progress metrics. It will also not change existing departmental regulatory responsibilities. Chaired by Sir Iain Duncan Smith, the TIGRR will report back to the Prime Minister in April 2021.

The background to the TIGRR’s mission is set out in its terms of reference:

‘The UK has a hard-won reputation as a great place to set up and scale a business due to its stable and predictable regulatory environment, competitive product and labour markets and dynamic financial sector. But the UK’s exit from the EU with a new Trade and Cooperation Agreement presents us with new opportunities to redesign or change how we implement regulation across the economy. As the Government seeks to reignite the economy to help it recover from the impacts of Covid, we should consider all the options available to us to stimulate business dynamism and innovation, ensure that our markets are open and competitive and that businesses can scale up unencumbered by any unnecessary administrative burden.’

The TIGRR’s key purpose and objectives are defined in the context of the options and opportunities associated with the UK’s ‘newfound regulatory freedoms’.

‘In particular:

• Opportunities which could drive innovation and accelerate the commercialisation and safe adoption of new technologies, cementing the UK’s position as a global science and technology superpower.

• Opportunities to reduce barriers to entry in specific markets and make markets more dynamic and contestable across the economy.

• Opportunities to reduce administrative barriers to scaling up productive businesses; and to tailor any necessary processes to the needs of UK start-ups and SMEs while maintaining the Government’s commitment to high environmental standards and worker protections.

• Opportunities to improve small business’ experience of necessary regulatory requirements.

• Sectors of the economy or regulatory frameworks which should be prioritised for further regulatory deep dives.’

Reforming regulatory implementation and reducing administrative burden for business are key drivers.

For submissions on opportunities to drive growth and innovation through regulatory reform, contact tigrr@cabinetoffice.gov.uk.

For further detail on the TIGRR, see: GOV.UK—Policy paper: Taskforce on Innovation, Growth and Regulatory Reform (TIGRR) Terms of Reference.

What’s next?

The TIGRR is expected to report back to the Prime Minister in April 2021 so that the proposals can be considered alongside the government’s broader economic growth and regulatory agenda.

 This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 3 February 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at:  www.lexisnexis.com

 Source: GOV.UK—Policy paper: Taskforce on Innovation, Growth and Regulatory Reform

Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll