header-logo header-logo

09 June 2021
Categories: Legal News , Tax , Profession
printer mail-detail

LNB news: Clamping down on promoters of tax avoidance: Law Society response

The Law Society has responded to HMRC’s consultation on a range of new measures to disrupt the business models relied on by promoters of tax avoidance

Lexis®Library update: HMRC consulted until 1 June 2021 on the following four proposals to further strengthen HMRC’s powers in relation to tax avoidance promoters:

• a new power for HMRC to seek a court order to secure a promoter’s assets to pay tax avoidance regime penalties, where the promoter has moved or hidden those assets in order to avoid paying penalties

• additional penalties for UK entities who are involved with an offshore promoter

• winding-up orders targeting companies involved in promoting or enabling tax avoidance and the power to disqualify directors at the earliest point possible

• powers for HMRC to publish information about avoidance schemes that it is inquiring into and to correct false statements, to help taxpayers avoid or exit such schemes

The Law Society supports the government’s aims to tackle promoters of mass-marketed avoidance schemes, but:

• any measures should be ‘appropriately targeted at the mischief they seek to prevent’

• threshold conditions for the application of the proposals should be strengthened to ensure they do not catch legitimate tax advisers or restrict the ability of taxpayers to obtain bespoke advice on their tax affairs

• the strengthened sanctions should apply only where any reasonable adviser would consider the arrangements abusive and where the GAAR would apply, or where there are material breaches of the POTAS rules

• HMRC’s exercise of powers under any new provisions should be effectively supervised

HMRC’s consultation ‘Clamping down on promoters of tax avoidance’ also included a useful list of the principal anti-avoidance legislation (Annex A) together with an overview of promoter and enabler penalties including the changes in Finance Bill 2021 (Annex B).

Source: Clamping down on promoters of tax avoidance – Law Society response

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 8 June 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/

 

Categories: Legal News , Tax , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll