header-logo header-logo

09 June 2021
Categories: Legal News , Tax , Profession
printer mail-detail

LNB news: Clamping down on promoters of tax avoidance: Law Society response

The Law Society has responded to HMRC’s consultation on a range of new measures to disrupt the business models relied on by promoters of tax avoidance

Lexis®Library update: HMRC consulted until 1 June 2021 on the following four proposals to further strengthen HMRC’s powers in relation to tax avoidance promoters:

• a new power for HMRC to seek a court order to secure a promoter’s assets to pay tax avoidance regime penalties, where the promoter has moved or hidden those assets in order to avoid paying penalties

• additional penalties for UK entities who are involved with an offshore promoter

• winding-up orders targeting companies involved in promoting or enabling tax avoidance and the power to disqualify directors at the earliest point possible

• powers for HMRC to publish information about avoidance schemes that it is inquiring into and to correct false statements, to help taxpayers avoid or exit such schemes

The Law Society supports the government’s aims to tackle promoters of mass-marketed avoidance schemes, but:

• any measures should be ‘appropriately targeted at the mischief they seek to prevent’

• threshold conditions for the application of the proposals should be strengthened to ensure they do not catch legitimate tax advisers or restrict the ability of taxpayers to obtain bespoke advice on their tax affairs

• the strengthened sanctions should apply only where any reasonable adviser would consider the arrangements abusive and where the GAAR would apply, or where there are material breaches of the POTAS rules

• HMRC’s exercise of powers under any new provisions should be effectively supervised

HMRC’s consultation ‘Clamping down on promoters of tax avoidance’ also included a useful list of the principal anti-avoidance legislation (Annex A) together with an overview of promoter and enabler penalties including the changes in Finance Bill 2021 (Annex B).

Source: Clamping down on promoters of tax avoidance – Law Society response

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 8 June 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/

 

Categories: Legal News , Tax , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll