header-logo header-logo

29 March 2021
Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

LNB news: Criminal legal aid sector experiencing serious difficulty notes review chief

Sir Christopher Bellamy QC has expressed concern over criminal legal aid challenges, calling it ‘a very serious situation’

Lexis®Library update: Addressing the Westminster Commission on Legal Aid’s inquiry, Bellamy highlighted that criminal legal aid practitioners are battling both a reduction in money and reduction in work, driven by fewer arrests.

He also noted the challenges of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, which has exacerbated the problem and ‘created the worst crisis the courts system has ever seen’.

Bellamy, who is leading the Independent Review on Criminal Legal Aid, will investigate the sustainability of criminal legal aid, looking particularly at efficiency and quality controls, and considering the position of the ‘user’, such as defendants, victims, witnesses and members of the jury. He intends to report the findings of his team to the government before 2022.

Source: 'Very serious situation': review chief highlights criminal legal aid challenges

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 26 March 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll