header-logo header-logo

13 February 2023
Categories: Legal News , Privacy , Criminal , Technology
printer mail-detail

LNB NEWS: Home Office publishes report on operation of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016

The Home Office has published a report on the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (IPA 2016), which discusses the findings of an internal review that was conducted into the operation of the IPA 2016 to determine whether it remains fit for purpose. 

Lexis®Library update: The report has said the IPA 2016 has achieved its aim of consolidating existing powers in relation to communications data, the interception of communications and equipment interference and oversight bodies, and the aim of enhanced oversight and safeguards for use of powers ‘appears’ to have been achieved. With respect to modernisation and futureproofing, the Home Office has that the the IPA 2016 has not been immune to changes in technology in the last six years and it will need to be kept under review.

The Home Office has further said that the Home Secretary, Suella Braverman, has appointed Lord Anderson to conduct a separate review into the IPA 2016 to inform any potential legislative change.

The report can be read here.

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 10 February 2023 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll