header-logo header-logo

LNB News: Home Office publishes updated guidance to progress immediate detriment cases

15 June 2021
Categories: Legal News , Pensions , Regulatory
printer mail-detail
The Home Office has published updated technical notes that provide informal and non-statutory guidance on immediate detriment cases as part of the litigation in The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice v McCloud; The Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Welsh Ministers and Others v Sargeant [2018] EWCA Civ 2844 (the McCloud/Sargeant judgment). 

Lexis®Library update: The aim of the update is to support pension managers and practitioners with processing immediate detriment cases.

Police Pension Schemes

The updated technical note for the Police Pension Schemes provides guidance on processing certain immediate detriment cases ahead of legislation in order to address the age discrimination identified by the Court of Appeal in the McCloud/Sargeant judgment. Immediate detriment refers to those members who have already retired or will do so before the remedy to the discrimination is implemented. The update relates to existing informal and non-statutory guidance, originally issued in August 2020, and is intended to support police force pension managers and practitioners to administer certain immediate detriment cases (as defined). While the guidance is intended to provide informal advice, the Home Office warns that the overall responsibility for interpreting and applying the pension scheme regulations remains with each chief constable as the relevant scheme manager.

Fire Pension Schemes

A corresponding update has been prepared at the request of the Fire Brigades Union and the Firefighters’ Pensions (England) Scheme Advisory Board to assist employers with immediate detriment cases specific to members of the Fire Pension Schemes in relation to the Firefighters’ Pension Scheme. This notes that the guidance is informal and does not place any legal obligations on Fire and Rescue Authorities (FRAs). The guidance also notes that it should not be seen as providing a definitive resolution, but a tool used by FRAs to progress any immediate detriment cases. The guidance outlines that it should not be seen as providing a definitive resolution to all of the consequences arising from the discrimination, rather as a way to progress certain immediate detriment cases. The guidance is also to be kept under review as all the cases processed using the guidance will need to be revisited once the full detail of the government’s approach is finalised, and legislation is in place. Legislation is expected to be in place by October 2023.

Sources:

• Police pension schemes: Home Office informal immediate detriment guidance

• Firefighters’ Pension Schemes: Home Office Guidance on treatment of ‘Immediate Detriment’ cases

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 14 June 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

Categories: Legal News , Pensions , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll