header-logo header-logo

15 June 2021
Categories: Legal News , Pensions , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

LNB News: Home Office publishes updated guidance to progress immediate detriment cases

The Home Office has published updated technical notes that provide informal and non-statutory guidance on immediate detriment cases as part of the litigation in The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice v McCloud; The Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Welsh Ministers and Others v Sargeant [2018] EWCA Civ 2844 (the McCloud/Sargeant judgment). 

Lexis®Library update: The aim of the update is to support pension managers and practitioners with processing immediate detriment cases.

Police Pension Schemes

The updated technical note for the Police Pension Schemes provides guidance on processing certain immediate detriment cases ahead of legislation in order to address the age discrimination identified by the Court of Appeal in the McCloud/Sargeant judgment. Immediate detriment refers to those members who have already retired or will do so before the remedy to the discrimination is implemented. The update relates to existing informal and non-statutory guidance, originally issued in August 2020, and is intended to support police force pension managers and practitioners to administer certain immediate detriment cases (as defined). While the guidance is intended to provide informal advice, the Home Office warns that the overall responsibility for interpreting and applying the pension scheme regulations remains with each chief constable as the relevant scheme manager.

Fire Pension Schemes

A corresponding update has been prepared at the request of the Fire Brigades Union and the Firefighters’ Pensions (England) Scheme Advisory Board to assist employers with immediate detriment cases specific to members of the Fire Pension Schemes in relation to the Firefighters’ Pension Scheme. This notes that the guidance is informal and does not place any legal obligations on Fire and Rescue Authorities (FRAs). The guidance also notes that it should not be seen as providing a definitive resolution, but a tool used by FRAs to progress any immediate detriment cases. The guidance outlines that it should not be seen as providing a definitive resolution to all of the consequences arising from the discrimination, rather as a way to progress certain immediate detriment cases. The guidance is also to be kept under review as all the cases processed using the guidance will need to be revisited once the full detail of the government’s approach is finalised, and legislation is in place. Legislation is expected to be in place by October 2023.

Sources:

• Police pension schemes: Home Office informal immediate detriment guidance

• Firefighters’ Pension Schemes: Home Office Guidance on treatment of ‘Immediate Detriment’ cases

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 14 June 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

Categories: Legal News , Pensions , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Sidley—Jeremy Trinder

Global finance group strengthened by returning partner in London

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
back-to-top-scroll