header-logo header-logo

LNB news: Law Society comments on National Security and Investment Bill

16 April 2021
Categories: Legal News , Commercial , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
The Law Society has commented on the National Security and Investment Bill (the Bill) in a Parliamentary Briefing
The Bill aims to give government powers to scrutinise and intervene in business transactions that may have implications for national security, particularly with regard to foreign investment. The Bill is currently in the report stage in the House of Lords. The Law Society has voiced its overall support for the Bill, but stressed the need for safeguards to avoid uncertainty and the creation of unnecessary burden on legitimate investment.

The Law Society made several recommendations for amending the Bill which serve to place limits on, and provide a framework for, the scope of government intervention. Among the many recommendations are:

• placing a definition of ‘national security’ for the purposes of the Bill

• shortening the timeframe within which the Secretary of State can make a call-in notice from five years to two

• placing more restrictive definitions on qualifying entities and assets for the purposes of the legislation

• tightening the scope of trigger events to avoid the capture of minority investors, and intra-group investments

• replacing the automatic voiding of notifiable acquisitions which have not followed procedural requirements, with a provision for voiding on the order of the Secretary of State

• urging the government to consult on how the review procedure for relevant transactions would take place, considering the quasi-judicial powers the Secretary of State would have in the matter, and the impracticality of appealing decisions to the High Court

To read the full list of recommendations, click here.

Source: Parliamentary briefing: National Security and Investment Bill – House of Lords report stage

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 15 April 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll