header-logo header-logo

16 April 2021
Categories: Legal News , Commercial , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

LNB news: Law Society comments on National Security and Investment Bill

The Law Society has commented on the National Security and Investment Bill (the Bill) in a Parliamentary Briefing
The Bill aims to give government powers to scrutinise and intervene in business transactions that may have implications for national security, particularly with regard to foreign investment. The Bill is currently in the report stage in the House of Lords. The Law Society has voiced its overall support for the Bill, but stressed the need for safeguards to avoid uncertainty and the creation of unnecessary burden on legitimate investment.

The Law Society made several recommendations for amending the Bill which serve to place limits on, and provide a framework for, the scope of government intervention. Among the many recommendations are:

• placing a definition of ‘national security’ for the purposes of the Bill

• shortening the timeframe within which the Secretary of State can make a call-in notice from five years to two

• placing more restrictive definitions on qualifying entities and assets for the purposes of the legislation

• tightening the scope of trigger events to avoid the capture of minority investors, and intra-group investments

• replacing the automatic voiding of notifiable acquisitions which have not followed procedural requirements, with a provision for voiding on the order of the Secretary of State

• urging the government to consult on how the review procedure for relevant transactions would take place, considering the quasi-judicial powers the Secretary of State would have in the matter, and the impracticality of appealing decisions to the High Court

To read the full list of recommendations, click here.

Source: Parliamentary briefing: National Security and Investment Bill – House of Lords report stage

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 15 April 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll