header-logo header-logo

LNB news: Law Society comments on National Security and Investment Bill

16 April 2021
Categories: Legal News , Commercial , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
The Law Society has commented on the National Security and Investment Bill (the Bill) in a Parliamentary Briefing
The Bill aims to give government powers to scrutinise and intervene in business transactions that may have implications for national security, particularly with regard to foreign investment. The Bill is currently in the report stage in the House of Lords. The Law Society has voiced its overall support for the Bill, but stressed the need for safeguards to avoid uncertainty and the creation of unnecessary burden on legitimate investment.

The Law Society made several recommendations for amending the Bill which serve to place limits on, and provide a framework for, the scope of government intervention. Among the many recommendations are:

• placing a definition of ‘national security’ for the purposes of the Bill

• shortening the timeframe within which the Secretary of State can make a call-in notice from five years to two

• placing more restrictive definitions on qualifying entities and assets for the purposes of the legislation

• tightening the scope of trigger events to avoid the capture of minority investors, and intra-group investments

• replacing the automatic voiding of notifiable acquisitions which have not followed procedural requirements, with a provision for voiding on the order of the Secretary of State

• urging the government to consult on how the review procedure for relevant transactions would take place, considering the quasi-judicial powers the Secretary of State would have in the matter, and the impracticality of appealing decisions to the High Court

To read the full list of recommendations, click here.

Source: Parliamentary briefing: National Security and Investment Bill – House of Lords report stage

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 15 April 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll