header-logo header-logo

27 July 2021
Categories: Legal News , Insurance / reinsurance , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

LNB news: Law Society publishes guide on closing Solicitors Indemnity Fund

The Law Society has published a guide relating to the closure of the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF), which will stop accepting new claims after 30 September 2022
Lexis®Library update: The Law Society states that the closure of the SIF affects firms in different ways, depending on if or when a practice closed.

The Law Society has identified four groups, and the steps that solicitors could now be taking in preparation for the closure of SIF:

Group A—firms that closed on or before August 2000 are covered by SIF and will continue to receive cover after SIF is closed

Group B—firms that closed between 1 September 2000–30 September 2016 face the most difficulty and should continue to engage with the insurance market. The Law Society notes it has also actively been engaging with the market, however limited alternatives are available.

Group C—firms that have closed since 1 October 2016 will not enter the SIF as it closes to new claims after 30 September 2022, which is before the six-year mandatory run off period ends. Unless alternative arrangements are made, this group will be left without protection when run-off cover expires.

Group D—existing or new firms' principals will need to consider steps to minimise future liability and will not benefit from the SIF.

The Law Society reminds firms to continue to pay for their run-off insurance. Failure to do so has negative effects, as participating insurers provide cover, regardless of whether premium has been paid. This leads to increased professional indemnity insurance premiums for the profession as a whole.

Source: Closure of the Solicitors Indemnity Fund

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 26 July 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll